<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This is Your Brain on Bebop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://religiousaffectionsministries.org/brain-bebop/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://religiousaffectionsministries.org/brain-bebop</link>
	<description>Worship, Music, Culture, and Aesthetics - Resources for Local Churches</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 08:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott Aniol</title>
		<link>http://religiousaffectionsministries.org/brain-bebop#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Aniol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 01:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://religiousaffectionsministries.org/?p=220#comment-148</guid>
		<description>Hey Josh.

Nope; doesn't really prove anything, I don't think. Just interesting. The most it proves maybe is that music does have a physiological affect on humans, but I don't think we can make any value judgments one way or another necessarily based on this data.

Thanks for stopping by!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Josh.</p>
<p>Nope; doesn&#8217;t really prove anything, I don&#8217;t think. Just interesting. The most it proves maybe is that music does have a physiological affect on humans, but I don&#8217;t think we can make any value judgments one way or another necessarily based on this data.</p>
<p>Thanks for stopping by!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://religiousaffectionsministries.org/brain-bebop#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 00:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://religiousaffectionsministries.org/?p=220#comment-147</guid>
		<description>Hi Scott,

I'm curious how much weight you give to this brain/body (that's my translation of "neurophysiologic") research in forming your perspective on music for worship (private or gathered)?  Can we consider it reliable just because someone decided to write a paper on it and got it published?  

Interesting, yes.
Compelling?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Scott,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious how much weight you give to this brain/body (that&#8217;s my translation of &#8220;neurophysiologic&#8221;) research in forming your perspective on music for worship (private or gathered)?  Can we consider it reliable just because someone decided to write a paper on it and got it published?  </p>
<p>Interesting, yes.<br />
Compelling?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
